Return to Awards home page.

Award For Hal Wingard Lifetime Achievement

Scoring Rubric

Checklist for Consideration of Application

Requirements Comments
Y/ N Postmarked by deadline of __________________ (date)
Y/ N Evidence of CLTA membership (minimum: this year and preceding year)
Y/ N Nominated by any CLTA member including CLTA board members
Y/ N Completed nomination form. Nominator _____________________________
Y/ N A letter of nomination, original plus three copies
Y/ N Three letters of recommendation, original plus three copies of each
Y/ N Brief professional resume/CV, original plus three copies
Y/ N A recent photograph (one copy suitable for display)
Y/ N Evidence of at least 20 years of language teaching and/or service to language education, at least five in California

*WLOE: World Languages other than English

If this checklist is complete (all requirements met), proceed to scoring rubric below.


Scoring Rubric

Nominee's Name or Number ______________________________

 Description

0

1

2

3

  4
Pts    Weight    Score
                   
Letters of support an/or nomination, or CV's provide the following:
Leadership in language education, i.e., professional language associations, state committees, the California Foreign Language Project,  record of publication (authorship), presentations at conferences, workshops, and seminars for teachers, students and / or parents No evidence of leadership

Limited evidence of leadership

Some evidence of leadership in one or more professional groups or settings Specific, detailed evidence of active leadership in one professional group or setting Specific, detailed evidence of active leadership in multiple groups or settings  X

10

 =  
Active promotion of language education, in California (or out of California if appropriate (i.e., activities with SWCOLT or ACTFL may be included, or work in other states in an earlier part of career)  No evidence Limited evidence Some evidence of involvement in promoting language educaiton Specific and detailed evidence of extensive  involvement in a limited range of activities promoting language education Specific and detailed evidence of extensive involvement in a broad range of activities promoting language education  X

6

 =  
Outstanding teaching ability at any level

No evidence of outstanding teaching practices

Limited evidence of outstanding teaching practices Some evidence of outstanding teaching practices Specific and detailed evidence of outstanding teaching practices Specific and detailed evidence of  a wide variety of outstanding teaching practices  X

4

 =  
               TOTAL  =   ____ / 80

Return to Awards home page.